The International Reporting (and Life) Adventures of Vivian Salama

Who Can Match Israel’s Lobby?

Posted by vmsalama on November 13, 2007

Here’s my latest commentary in PostGlobal (washingtonpost.com)  As always, I am interested to hear your thoughts!
by Vivian Salama

The day after I returned from a three-year stint reporting in the Middle East, while war raged between Israel and Hezbollah militants, I turned on the news back here at home. It was eye-opening.

At the time I was jet-lagged, culture-shocked, and feeling seriously withdrawn from the controversy from which I had so suddenly removed myself. It was a difficult time to return. The first story I saw on TV was a pro-Israel war rally taking place here in New York. Would-be presidential candidate Hillary Clinton gave the keynote address. She told the crowd of thousands, “We will stand with Israel because Israel is standing for American values as well as Israeli ones.”

A day or two later, still glued to the television set, I caught one of Pat Buchanan’s several MSNBC appearances. With the blunt candor he is known for, Buchanan said, with regard to presidential hopefuls and the Israel-Hezbollah war, “Let’s face it: there are more people in America who will vote for you because you are pro-Israel than those who will vote for you because you are pro-Arab.”

According to Mearsheimer and Walt, authors of the controversial Israel Lobby, “we use ‘the Lobby’ as a convenient short-hand term for the loose coalition of individuals and organizations who actively work to shape U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction.” Of course, this should not be blurred with the Jewish lobby. The Israel Lobby has more influence on U.S. foreign policy because it has the support of many conservative Christian groups, which the mainstream media dubbed “Christian Zionists” in the days following September 11th. Certainly it is worth noting that Israel receives the most U.S. foreign aid per year ($2.5 billion in 2006, according to Reuters), though I hesitate to say that this is directly the result of the lobby – especially since Egypt and Colombia, the second and third highest recipients, respectfully, do not have nearly the same lobbying support as does Israel.

Rather than question the power and/or influence of the Israel lobby, I’d like to pose a related question: Is there any lobby that is nearly as influential as Israel’s? The recent decision by a U.S. Congressional panel to recognize the Armenian genocide in Ottoman Turkey was a major success for the Armenian Lobby in America – though it came after many years of lobbying. After a countermeasure supported by the Turkish Lobby, as many as eleven House members later withdrew their support for the genocide resolution. Of course, this is likely due to America’s reliance on Turkey as a strategic regional partner rather than the Turkish lobby’s pull in Washington. The Indian Lobby has been gaining ground in the U.S., particularly in light of the somewhat recent nuclear deal between the U.S. and India.

Still, none have mobilized in the way the Israel Lobby has since the days of World War II. (An interesting book documenting the earlier days of the Israel/Jewish Lobby is Arieh J. Kochavi’s “Post-Holocaust Politics”).

What about the Arab lobby? There is no cohesive Arab lobby in the U.S. Groups such as the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, the Arab American Institute (AAI) and a few Islamic groups pose as lobbyists, but it is really the oil companies (or their respective Gulf monarchs) and various donors who serve as the true supplicants. The problem is that they do not truly represent the Arab people.

There’s no telling whether recent developments, including Condoleezza Rice’s comments about the imminence of a Palestinian state or AIPAC’s legal troubles, will eventually level the lobbying playing field. For now, however, it is hard to imagine that any group will surpass the Israel lobby’s ability to win hearts and minds in Washington.


2 Responses to “Who Can Match Israel’s Lobby?”

  1. A. said

    The major difference is that all other lobbies have a clear and straight-forward purpose. And their purpose is tangible and realistic. The Indian lobby, for example, wants to have a grip on an equitable deal for India and not a trade of rights for some warm words. The NRA is about guns and the Arab lobby is divided into two groups of (a) major Sunni governments, that want to extend their undemorcratic, despotic regimes and buy some life extension for their regimes and/or make a few bucks on the side on arms deals, etc., and (b) the immigrant lot and those that want to have the most simple right of voting and choosing their own leaders.
    The Israeli lobby, however, wants to keep the picture confused and murky, set up a direct channel to some ancient religious matters, dissolve the original dividing line between Jews and Christians (alas Jesus was a radical protestant Jew, who wanted to choose peace and not fight wars of eye-for-an-eye) and allow America to have any other friend in the Middle East. The Faustian approach of the Israeli lobby shows where there is nothing gained in return by Uncle Sam. Why, for example, Israel has not hosted American military bases all these years? That will in fact provide the security that Israel wants, akin to Germany after WW II. Finally, it is important to remember that Israel is the last living member of a racist Apartheid regime.

  2. Niyaz PK said

    India is clearly shifting its path.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: