Wanderlust…

ONLY IN ADVENTURE DO WE TRULY FIND OURSELVES.

Archive for the ‘Terrorism’ Category

Lahore attacks: Search for suspects continues

Posted by vmsalama on March 4, 2009

Pakistan is coming under attack for failing to arrest the suspects responsible for yesterday’s deadly attacks on the convoy carrying Sri Lanka’s national cricket team to the Gadaffi Stadium in Lahore.  Pakistan’s former Interior Minister and member of President Asif Zardari’s Pakistan People’s Party told the New York Times “This happened in the heart of Lahore, the cultural capital of the country. None of the attackers were shot or caught, and they were coming to the scene with big bags. That’s absurd.” Meanwhile, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, headed by Nawaz Sharif, has accused the government of putting politics before security.  The following are a few reports I did today:

TV-New Zealand Report

http://tvnz.co.nz/world-news/pakistans-war-militants-under-scrutiny-2517316/video 

Photo by Vivian Salama

photo by Vivian Salama

Vivian Salama, The National

LAHORE // By morning rush hour yesterday, the scene of Tuesday’s commando-style attacks on the Sri Lankan national cricket team had been transformed into a mass shrine.

“Long live the traffic warden!” the crowd chanted between recited prayers, many laying flowers only a few metres from where he was fatally shot.

The victims, identified by Pakistani authorities as elite force officers Tipu Sultan, Mudassar Kumboh, Faisal Butt, Sultan Farid and “Mahmoud”, as well Iqbal and one of the team’s drivers, Zafar Khan, were killed when 12 heavily armed gunmen ambushed a convoy carrying Sri Lankan players and coaches to Lahore’s Qadafi Stadium. None of the cricketers suffered serious injury.

(click here to read more….)

Posted in Pakistan, Terrorism | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Sri Lankan Cricket team attacked in Lahore

Posted by vmsalama on March 3, 2009

I woke up to the news today that there was a commando-style attack in Liberty Chawk just around the corner from Gadaffi stadium.  The target was the convoy carrying Sri Lanka’s national cricket team to the stadium. The Samaa and CNBC studios are located right there in the square so they managed to get a bit of footage.  The images were eerily similar to the little footage released from the seige on Mumbai last November and Pakistani officials are already saying that there may be links between the two. India blamed the Mumbai attacks on Lashkar-e-Taiba, a banned Pakistani extremist organization and so there will inevitably be some repercussions in the days to come. Meanwhile, Lahore is on lockdown as police scramble to find the dozen or so suspects responsible for killing 6 policemen and one of the convoy’s drivers. 

Here are a few reports I did throughout the day:

Mortal Blow to a Nation’s Passion

Vivian Salama, The National

March 4, 2009

LAHORE // By midday, the Abdul Qadir International Cricket Academy is usually bustling with young boys sprinting around the field, demonstrating their sportsmanship and mimicking the game’s stars.cricket-dead

Yesterday, there was not a player in sight.

Fields across the city of Lahore remained deserted following an assault on the Sri Lankan national cricket team that left six police officers and one civilian dead and several players wounded. Boys who would normally stay out late into the evening playing with their friends opted to stay home, many of them devastated by news of the attacks. 

“[This] incident will definitely be damaging to the game of cricket,” said Abdul Qadir, a former captain of the Pakistani national cricket team, and owner of the Abdul Qadir International Cricket Academy, located a few steps from the Gadaffi Stadium, scene of yesterday’s attack.  (click here to read more….)

TELEVISION:

CBC (Canada)

http://www.cbc.ca/clips/mov/salama-lahore090303.mov 

France24 – the Debate

PART I - http://www.france24 .com/en/20090304 -the-debate- who-s-targeting- pakistan- 1

PART 2 - http://www.france24 .com/en/20090304 -the-debate- who-s-targeting- pakistan- 2

Posted in Pakistan, Terrorism | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Open Letter to President-Elect Obama from the Political Council for the Iraqi Resistance

Posted by vmsalama on November 9, 2008

This is an interesting letter from the Political Council for the Iraqi Resistance, an Iraqi insurgent “political” coalition comprising of six major Sunni militant groups.  

It has been interesting to track the various online responses by militant groups to the elections and it is something I will be looking at quite closely in the coming weeks. 

—–

An Open Letter: To Barak Obama the new president of the United States of America 

We should put in front of you some points for the new American administration to benefit from and to use to avoid the mistakes that the old administration fell into: 

I- The reason why you won the presidency is not because the Americans suddenly found out that they should not be racist, it is because of the many mistakes that the Bush administration fell under which didn’t leave for the American citizen any room, not even for a second to think about keeping that administration and the least proof for this is the large numbers of votes against them. 

II- Your campaign promises were built on change and the time for it has come, and we say with that the time has come- the destruction that the previous administration caused for our country from killings, displacement, civil war and racism- has damaged your reputation as American people and it damaged elements of a nation that did not attack you by your own recognition and therefore we ask for change and do not listen to those who tell you that a withdrawal from Iraq is a defeat. We say to you that a withdrawal will mean a triumph of reason and logic. 

III- The vast number of people who have voted for you means that you can take your actions with courage. The disarray of those before you hurt the American people before anyone else, Allah swt has told us in his righteous book that he created man to get to know each other not for one to kill the other O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other (not that ye may despise (each other). Verily the most honoured of you in the sight of Allah is (he who is) the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things). 

IV- We are a country known for its courage and generosity and our good treatment to strangers. Whoever is good to us we are good to him more than he is good to us, and whoever attacks us he will find from us no mercy, so what do you think we will do to an invader who tampered with our religion and our country, its destiny, security and unity? 

V- To surround our countries security by making agreements with others around us to accomplish your interests and their interests at the expense of the interests of our people will have serious consequences. It is up to you not to try this and not to solve your problems with others at our expense and you should understand this. 

VI- We will be flexible in dealing with your withdrawal but it must not be as part of a security deal with parties that are traitors or a made up government. You must correct your mistakes and work with courage to pay compensation to all those who you have destroyed, their families or their house or their psychology. And you must release all those you have as prisoners until the last Iraqi of them, and you must order the sectarian government to release all its prisoners and to return the balance of security to Iraq. Without this we will not think that you will be coming with the change that you have promised, and if you do this you will be written down in history as the courageous one. 

And finally we in the resistance are staying on our promise to liberate our country and we will not tear from this, the history of our grandparents is the best witness and we will be the best next of kin to that kin in protecting the sanctity of our nation

– PCIR

Posted in Elections, Iraq, Obama, Terrorism | Leave a Comment »

Political Storm Finds a Columbia Professor

Posted by vmsalama on November 1, 2008

As a former student of Rashid Khalidi, I can say with confidence that the accusations by Sarah Palin and John McCain of the professor’s “radical” associations to the PLO are absolutely outrageous and infuriating.  The fact that they would dedicate so much time to such a trivial (and false) subject just days before the election, when the country’s economy is tanking and its troops are dying, confirms in my mind the fact that a McCain/Palin ticket will only lead our country into further catastrophe.  There are plenty of people around the world who regard advisors to the Bush administration as also having links to a “terrorist organization.” What they have done to Dr Khalidi is, in my opinion, defamatory and I really hope that Americans recognize that.  

Political Storm Finds a Columbia Professor

Published: October 30, 2008

Rashid Khalidi had been bracing for the storm for months, friends said

Since an April news report detailing his relationship with Senator Barack Obama, Mr. Khalidi, a Middle East scholar and passionate defender ofPalestinian rights, had waited to see himself caricatured by Republicans as part of a rogues’ gallery of Obama associates, which has come to include the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. andWilliam C. Ayers, a former member of the Weather Underground.

He was surprised, the friends said, that so little criticism came — until this last frenzied week before the election, when Senator John McCain cited the April article in The Los Angeles Times about a dinner Mr. Obama attended in Mr. Khalidi’s honor in 2003, and questioned Mr. Obama’s commitment to Israel.

In recent days, Republican partisans have accused Mr. Khalidi, a professor at Columbia University since 2003, of everything from anti-Semitism to baby-sitting for Mr. Obama’s children.

For Columbia, the firestorm is the latest episode in a string of messy, public controversies regarding Middle East politics. In 2004, pro-Palestinian professors were accused of intimidating Jewish students. Mr. Khalidi was not one of those teachers, but he was barred the next year from lecturing New York City public school teachers for having used the words “racist” and “apartheid” in discussions of Israel.

“It just seems really ironic to me that Rashid would be singled out as a figure in the trumped-up controversy,” Alan Brinkley, Columbia’s provost and a friend of Mr. Khalidi’s since 1985, said in a telephone interview Thursday. “In a field that is often politicized, he is respected by people on the right as well as the left.”

Ariel Beery, a former Columbia student leader who was involved in a pro-Israel group’s film about the 2004 controversy, said Mr. Khalidi was different from those accused of intimidation.

“In terms of his role as a professor, he was excellent,” Mr. Beery said Thursday in a telephone interview from Israel, where he lives. “He was provoking, he always allowed for different opinions, he had an open zone where people could voice their disagreement.”

Mr. Beery did criticize Mr. Khalidi’s leadership of the Middle East Institute at Columbia, saying it was “highly politicized” and “not promoting a diverse view of the Middle East.”

Mr. Khalidi, who is on sabbatical, declined to comment.

Mr. Khalidi, the Edward Said professor of Arab studies at Columbia, was born in Manhattan in 1948. His father, a Palestinian Muslim born in Jerusalem, worked for theUnited Nations, and his mother, a Lebanese-American Christian, was an interior decorator. He graduated from the United Nations International School and earned his bachelor’s degree from Yale in 1970 and a doctorate from Oxford University in 1974.

He taught at universities in Lebanon until the mid-’80s, and some critics accuse him of having been a spokesman for the Palestine Liberation Organization. Mr. Khalidi has denied working for the group, and says he was consulted as an expert by reporters seeking to understand it.

He was an adviser to the Palestinian delegation during Middle East peace talks from 1991 to 1993. From 1987 until 2003, he was a professor at the University of Chicago, where he became friends with Mr. Obama.

At Mr. Khalidi’s farewell party in 2003, according to the Los Angeles Times article, Mr. Obama fondly recalled their many conversations, saying they provided “consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases.” But Mr. Khalidi told Harper’s Magazine that a report in National Review Online that he had baby-sat for Mr. Obama’s children was nonsense.

Daniel Pipes, who directs the conservative Middle East Forum, said: “If one’s talking about American political life, he’s at the extremes, at the margins. If one’s talking about the field of Middle East studies, he’s in the middle of it. But the field itself is dominated by professors who do not permit other points of view.”

In 2005, after a New York Sun article highlighted some of Mr. Khalidi’s statements, the New York City schools chancellor, Joel I. Klein, barred Mr. Khalidi from a teacher-training course. In an interview with The New York Times, Mr. Khalidi said then that he “may have used the word ‘racist’ about Israeli policies,” and acknowledged saying in a speech that if the movement of Palestinians continued to be restricted, “it would develop into worse than the apartheid system.”

Addressing an accusation that he had endorsed the killing of Israeli soldiers as legitimate “resistance” to occupation, he said: “Under international law, resistance to occupation is legitimate. I didn’t endorse killing Israeli soldiers. These people will take anything out of context. Anyone who knows me knows the last thing I am is extreme. I’ve called suicide bombings a war crime. I’m a ferocious critic of Arafat.”

Rabbi J. Rolando Matalon of Congregation B’nai Jeshurun, a liberal synagogue on the Upper West Side, said he has known Mr. Khalidi for years and called the allegations “completely absurd and uncalled for and malicious.”

Referring to comments he had seen on blogs and television, he said, “In no way has he ever indicated that he favors the destruction or disappearance of Israel,” and added, “He has always been consistently in favor of dialogue and common ground.”

At Columbia, Mr. Khalidi is known as a gregarious scholar who takes a special interest in students, often meeting them for lunch near campus and hosting dinners featuring Palestinian food cooked by his wife, Mona, an assistant dean at the university. After he came under attack this week, students created a Facebook group called “I stand by Rashid Khalidi,” with 205 members by Thursday night.

“He makes history entertaining,” said Maher Awartani, 24, an Arab student leader who has taken his class. “It’s like a grandfather telling his grandson a story of what happened.”

Mr. Awartani criticized not just the McCain campaign but also the Obama campaign’s tepid response, saying, “It should have been like, yes, I know him, and I’d like to know more Middle East experts, because that’s an important thing when you’re making policies.”

Karen Zraick contributed reporting.

 

Posted in Middle East, Palestinians, Politics, Terrorism, United Arab Emirates, United States | Leave a Comment »

Official Al Qaeda Statement: Humiliate the Republicans

Posted by vmsalama on October 31, 2008

Al Qaeda has finally made an official statement of policy regarding the 2008 US elections, and it is a ringing “anti-endorsement” for the Republican Party. 

The ”anti-endorsement”, posted on the jihadist forums a week before the Election Day 2008, was included towards the end of the message. The message, from Al Qaeda leader (and Bagram prison escapee) Abu Yahya al Libi, was a Khutba or sermon delivered in honor of the Eid al Fitre holiday. 

Unlike 2004, when Bin Laden referenced both candidates by name, but refrained from actually endorsing either, Al Libi specifically calls for the wrath of Allah to be brought down upon the Republicans. 

The message is more of a “vote against” message calling for the party of Bush to be humiliated, rather than a “vote for” message promoting Obama and the Democrats: 

Oh Allah, Lord of mankind, humiliate Bush and his party! 

Oh, Allah, degrade and defy him! 

Oh Allah, Lord of mankind, defy him!

Oh Allah, make him live a day like the day Pharoah, Haman, and Qarun experienced, making him an example… 

Comments about the election have been few and far between on the jihadist forums and in message from Al Qaeda leadership this year. This is a sharp contrast to the 2004 election, when discussion about candidates Bush and Kerry began months in advance of Election Day, and culminated in an official As Sahab release of a video tape from Osama bin Laden. 

In a video released just 4 days before Election Day 2004, Bin Laden said: 

Your security is not in the hands of Kerry or Bush or Al-Qa’ida. 
Your security is in your own hands” 

At this point, it is not known whether or not Bin Laden will comment on the 2008 US Presidential Election. With just days to go before the election, we’ll know soon whether or not Bin Laden will make a 
statement. 

In the meantime, it appears obvious from Al Libi’s statement that Al Qaeda is not supporting the Republicans.

Posted in Elections, Politics, Terrorism, United States | Leave a Comment »

US embarrassment over Mandela terrorist ‘threat’

Posted by vmsalama on July 3, 2008

I am speechless by this news.  I first heard it while driving from Dubai to Abu Dhabi yesterday and found it difficult not to ram my car into the railing.  EMBARRASSMENT is an understatement.  I had an interesting discussion with an Emirati friend of mine about America’s need for taking such harsh precautions as dubbing someone a terrorist – it’s as though it uses such titles as a way to validate many of its actions, not to mention its War on Terror. What’s amazing to me is the gap of time between when the Nobel Peace Prize committee recognized Nelson Mandela’s role as a peace maker and America’s acknowledgement, which came only yesterday.  Even the North Korean Government managed to get itself dropped from the list before Mandela!!!!

Posted Wed Jul 2, 2008 3:02pm AEST

Even the North Korean Government managed to get itself dropped from the list before Mr Mandela. 

Last weekend he was the guest of honour at a huge concert in London to mark his 90th birthday.

More than 64,000 people packed Hyde Park and millions watched the concert on television around the world.

But last weekend when former South African president Nelson Mandela was soaking in the musical tributes, he was still on the US Government’s terrorism watch list.

The internationally revered former South African president was officially regarded as a threat to US national security because of his long association with the African National Congress.

Even the North Korean Government managed to get itself dropped from the list before Mr Mandela.

In April this year US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had expressed her embarrassment at having to wave in people like the foreign minister of South Africa and former leaders like Nelson Mandela.

That was an embarrassment shared by Amir Woods from the Institute of Policy Studies when she spoke to National Public Radio in the US.

“It is absolutely a travesty that Mandela, that really all of the leaders of South Africa have to get a special pass to be able to travel to the US because of these travel restrictions,” Ms Woods said.

“So the Bush administration has quite rightly moved on North Korea to remove North Korea from that list of terrorists.”

“But all these decades, since the end of the Apartheid era we still have South Africa on, especially the African National Congress including Nelson Mandela, on that list of terrorists.”

“I think we need to really applaud the Black Congressional Caucus who, they took up this mantle and they have pushed just as they did in the anti-Apartheid struggle.”

“They have pushed to say look, we need to really recognise an error here in US policy and move swiftly to change it.”

“So it is their leadership that has brought congressional action, it is also the leadership of the South Africans who have said enough is enough.”

Dr Michael McKinley, a senior lecturer in international relations and strategy at the ANU, says the process of being included or dropped from Washington’s terror watch list is complicated.

“The definition of what goes on it is quite elastic,” Dr McKinley said.

“It goes back to his [Mandela's] days as an active member of the African National Congress, the ANC.

“Because the United States was interested in conducting various arrangements with that Apartheid government it was thought necessary to put the ANC on there.

“And also the ANC were thought to be and were left of centre.”

But how does North Korea qualify to be taken off the infamous list before a Nobel Peace Prize winner in Nelson Mandela?

“This is one of the more curious developments because what prompted Washington to remove North Korea from the list was North Korea began behaving in a way which suggested they were going to meet, if not halfway at least part of the way, US demands with regard to their nuclear program,” Dr McKinley said.

“The nuclear program and their association with international terrorism are not necessarily connected. They can be, but they’re not necessarily connected.

“So the United States seems to have responded in one area because of a favourable development in another, which is not entirely logical in the circumstances.”

Adapted from a report by Paula Kruger for The World Today

Posted in Mandela, Terrorism, United States | Leave a Comment »

Retraining for Saudi Arabian Clerics

Posted by vmsalama on March 24, 2008

This is really interesting, but I doubt it’ll be all that effective.  You cannot reprogram these clerics.   Their militancy is several years in the making and much of it is directed at the very government that now seeks to reverse this.  A few lectures isn’t going to accomplish much to convince these guys that the government of Saudi Arabia isn’t run by apostates. 

TELEGRAPH.CO.UK

By Damien McElroy, Foreign Affairs Correspondent 

Saudi Arabia is to launch a retraining programme for 40,000 Islamic clerics as it struggles to remove militant sympathies in Osama bin Laden’s homeland.

Officials in the kingdom have sought to manage hardline beliefs within the state-sponsored Wahhabist tradition in the aftermath of the 2001 attacks on America. For years senior ministers alternated between outright denial of endemic militancy and the adoption of reforms demanded by the West.

Al-Sharq al-Awsat, a newspaper close to the reformist wing of the royal family, yesterday reported that Saleh al-Sheikh, the minister of Islamic affairs, planned to run seminars for every prayer leader.

Clerics will be required to attend lectures at the Centre for National Dialogue, which also operates a rehabilitation programme for former extremists, including those Saudis released from Guantanamo Bay.

Links between al-Qa’eda and Saudi Arabia’s religious hierarchy moved from diplomatic liability to national crisis after the group carried out terrorist attacks in the kingdom in 2004 and 2005. Until these attacks, Mr Sheikh ruled out wholesale reforms as unnecessary.

If Saudi Arabia was as bad as its critics alleged, he said, it would harbour “tens of thousands of terrorists”.

But in the past two years the leadership has had to sack up to 1,000 clerics, which has forced the adoption of a wider retraining programme.

Although few details of the retraining have been released, its impact could stretch across the Islamic world. Its outcome could be pivotal to the Saud dynasty, which owes its dominant position to an 18th century alliance with Wahhabism’s founder, Muhammad ibn Abd-al-Wahhab. Wahhabism maintains the orthodoxies of early Islamic preachers.

The surge of oil revenues in the 20th century saw Saudi preachers spread across Islamic communities, displacing the often more benign local religious practitioners

Posted in Saudi Arabia, Terrorism | Leave a Comment »

Kurdish Minister Says Turkey’s Attacks Are Self-Defeating

Posted by vmsalama on January 7, 2008

by Vivian Salama

PostGlobal – WashingtonPost.com

The Turkish military has stepped up attacks against Kurdish rebels hiding in the mountains of Northern Iraq. Warplanes have carried out a number of cross-border raids to target the thousands of militants whom the military suspects are taking shelter in the predominantly Kurdish part of Iraq. In response to the bombings’ displacement of numerous Kurdish Iraqi families, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has ordered the government to pay one million dinars (approximately US$ 815).The strikes followed an agreement between the United States and Turkey to share intelligence on the activities of the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK), which was labeled a terrorist organization by both Turkey and the United States. The semi-autonomous Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) – an important U.S. ally – has lobbied in Washington and Ankara against a military incursion. The escalating situation in Northern Iraq is expected to dominate the agenda when President George W. Bush hosts Turkey’s President Abdullah Gul at the White House on Jan. 8.Kurdish officials condemn Turkey’s attacks, saying they have done little to quell PKK activities and have only delayed a viable solution. Meanwhile, a PKK leader in Northern Iraq has vowed to take his people’s battle for autonomy deep within Turkey’s borders.

Falah Mustafa Bakir, the Minister of Foreign Affairs for the KRG, says the attacks are a violation of Iraqi sovereignty. He spoke to Vivian Salama from Irbil on December 31st.

Excerpts:
Vivian Salama: At least three hundred Turkish commandos have reportedly raided Northern Iraq. What is the official response to this by the Regional Government of Kurdistan?

Falah Mustafa Bakir: The Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq demands that Turkey end immediately its military actions in Iraq. The entire political leadership of Iraq — Arabs and Kurds — is united in condemning Turkey’s attack on our territory, which is in violation of Iraqi sovereignty. Turkish forces should not be operating in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Military action moves us farther away from a solution, not closer.

Information that emerged last week suggests that President Bush may have made a deal with President Erdogan during his Nov. 5 visit to Washington, under which the Turks would get a green light to attack PKK bases. You have repeatedly made reference to Kurdistan’s strong ties with the United States. What is your reaction to this information? Were you aware of such an agreement?

The Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq counts itself among America’s best friends and allies in Iraq and the Middle East. I do not know about a “green light,” but we were aware of the widely reported agreement between the United States and Turkey regarding intelligence-sharing about the PKK.

Washington should understand the dangerous precedent and negative consequences of allowing Turkey, or any of Iraq’s neighbors, to take military action in Iraqi territory. We are appealing formally to the United States — as a close friend of the KRG, Iraq, and Turkey — to use its good offices to demand an immediate end to Turkish military action and to support a peaceful diplomatic solution to this long-running conflict. The U.S. has an important role to play in protecting the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Iraq and in bringing all parties to the table to seek a peaceful solution.

Kurdish officials have traveled to Ankara in an attempt to dissuade Turkey from taking such actions. Still, Turkey went ahead with the raids. What does this tell you about Turkey’s willingness to cooperate with the KRG?

The KRG does not support the PKK in any way, and therefore our territory and our people should not be accountable for PKK violence against Turkish citizens and soldiers. Indeed, we have condemned these acts of violence by the PKK. Furthermore, the KRG, both publicly and privately, has made clear that it is ready to work with Turkey on a comprehensive political solution to the problem of the PKK. KRG Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani has formally offered talks with Ankara in a multi-lateral context — that is, including Turkey, US, and Iraqi officials. You would have to ask Turkish officials why they spurn KRG offers of dialogue and cooperation on the PKK and other issues, and instead resort to military force against our region of Iraq. Despite recent Turkish actions, we still are open to a political solution and willing to sit down at any time and in any place to seek a peaceful solution. It is not too late for diplomacy to succeed.

How do you think such a move by Turkey will impact the (in)stability in greater Iraq, if at all?

Turkey’s actions will only hinder efforts toward stability and national reconciliation in Iraq. This is a delicate time in Iraqi politics, with some progress being made with regard to security. The Kurdistan Region has so far been free of the sectarian violence that has consumed much of the rest of the country. The KRG’s commitment to democracy and the rule of law should be seen as a model for the rest of Iraq. An attack on our region threatens the stability and progress not only of the Kurdistan Region, but of all of Iraq. We hope the Turkish authorities will understand that these attacks will only make the situation worse for all concerned. We want peaceful and productive relations with all our neighbors, especially Turkey, and we are willing to work with them to bring stability to our common border.

What, in your belief, is the solution to the PKK-Turkey issue?

The long-term solution to the PKK problem is political, not military. It is connected to the larger issue of the role of the Kurds in Turkish politics. There has been some progress on the Kurdish issue by the current government in Turkey, but more needs to be done. We hope that Turkey will come to realize this, and that it will also understand that we in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq pose no threat to anyone. Our stability and progress should be seen by all our neighbors as a positive development.

Posted in Iraq, Kurdish, Politics, Terrorism, Turkey, United States | Leave a Comment »

Pakistani Government Must do more to Quell Fanatacism

Posted by vmsalama on December 27, 2007

As always, I am interested to hear your thoughts. 

by Vivian Salama

PostGlobal – WashingtonPost.com

                   When Benazir Bhutto spoke to the Council of Foreign Relations last August before returning from exile to Pakistan, she said, “The West’s close association with a military dictatorship, in my humble view, is alienating Pakistan’s people and is playing into the hands of those hardliners who blame the West for the ills of the region.”
                    Those hardliners to whom she referred, while safely in New York, are likely the same people who took her life in Pakistan on Thursday evening. The news of Bhutto’s assassination is a grim reminder that of religious extremists are attempting to reverse the moderating influences of globalization.

                    Meanwhile, Pakistani politicians have moved quickly to exploit her death as grounds for political gain rather than for productive partnership and dialogue. Nawaz Sharif vowed to boycott the January elections upon news of Bhutto’s death – after all, he had only agreed to participate in the election on the coattails of Bhutto’s Pakistan People’s Party (PPP). However with no Bhutto, it is unlikely that the PPP will participate in the January election either, seeing as there is no obvious successor to its assassinated leader.
                  President Pervez Musharraf only recently lifted the controversial Emergency Law, implemented shortly after Bhutto’s return. If he decides that this situation legitimates the reimplementation of martial law, it will not quell the imminent backlash his government will see on the Pakistani street. Bhutto was an immensely popular leader, her death will not blow over quickly.
                  Conspiracy theories will likely emerge, particularly from Bhutto’s supporters, many of whom felt that Musharraf never sincerely wanted to engage in any semblance of power sharing with Bhutto. Just as there was no serious investigation following the October attacks against Bhutto hours after her arrival to Pakistan, it is unlikely there will be a serious investigation into the attack that killed her.
                  If anything, this latest tragedy will reinforce the idea that Pakistan is a dangerous place. Lawmakers in Washington have expressed skepticism about the use of US military aid to Pakistan – a key ally in the war on terrorism – particularly after Musharraf imposed emergency rule. Lawmakers moved to put limits on the USD$300 million the US sends to Pakistan each year. A bill passed by Congress last week now reserves USD$250 million of those funds for counter-terrorism operations. Above all else, the world is now holding its breath as its watches Pakistan – a nuclear power – on the verge of collapse.
                One thing is certain: Bhutto’s assassination will trigger civil unrest for months to come. It is important not to let this tragedy divert attention from the issue at hand: there is a growing radical movement in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Suicide bombings now average one in every five days in Pakistan. While there are numerous political parties pitted against one another, it is unlikely they would have used suicide tactics to settle the score. More needs to be done by the Pakistani government to quash the spread of fanaticism before it engulfs the whole of the region.

Posted in Afghanistan, Bhutto, Musharraf, Pakistan, Politics, Terrorism, United States | 1 Comment »

Terrorists and the Media

Posted by vmsalama on December 23, 2007

This quote by Jack Straw – Britain’s former Foreign Secretary – I find to be extremely fascinating, and a sign of the times.  It directly correlates with my Newsweek article from earlier this week entitled ASK A TERRORIST (on my blog, it is listed as the post immediately preceding this one). 

“The advent of new technologies, advanced means of communication and evermore sophisticated ways of moving money around have already influenced the way terrorists operate and will continue to do so.  Terrorist organizers and fundraisers no longer have to be in the same country as their target or indeed as each other.  Their communications to each other can be encrypted.  And there is the potential, if the right targets are hit (such as strategic computer systems running banking or air traffic control operations), to affect thoughts of even millions of people.”

Jack Straw, UK Home Secretary

(quoted from O’Brien, Kevin A. “Information Age Terrorism and Warfare.” Globalisation and the New Terror: the Asia Pacific dimension. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar. 2004, 127.)

Posted in Media, Terrorism | Leave a Comment »