Wanderlust…

ONLY IN ADVENTURE DO WE TRULY FIND OURSELVES.

Archive for November 7th, 2007

“Who Inspires You?” In Syria, the answer may be a surprise

Posted by vmsalama on November 7, 2007

Today I read an interesting article by my friend in Damascus, Sami Moubayed, an author and academic.  Sami is one of the most patriotic Syrians I know and is a writing machine, releasing articles weekly on subjects relating to politics, nationalism and the world.  One in particular that caught my eye this week was entitled Mahatir and Zayed, Nasser and Arafat.  He asked his Syrian students the question: “Who is your Inspiration?”  At the time, war raged between Hezbollah fighters and Israel and so his expectation was that the majority would reply “Hassan Nasrallah,” the leader of Hezbollah who certainly won the hearts and minds of many across the Arab world for his defiance and resilience against Israel.  On the contrary, 60% of his students (most of whom are majors in International Affairs) replied “No one.”  See the full article below:

by Sami Moubayed

Forward Magazine I have always been interested in ‘role models.’ Whenever I conduct a personal interview with famous Syrians, I always wrap up with one question, “Who are your inspirational figures; who are your role models in life?” A role model by definition can be a friend or a family member, a living celebrity, or a long gone iconic figure. Over the years, I have gotten a colorful variety of answers. Most people usually say “My father.” Duraid Lahham, however, said; “My mother!” Ambassador Imad Moustapha said it was his great-grandfather Abdul Rahman Kawakbi, among others, and Maestro Sulhi al-Wadi. The former ambassador and officer Suhayl al-Ashi said it was the late President Shukri al-Quwatli. Expatriate Minister Buthaina Shaaban said it was the late President Hafez al-Assad. Mohammad al-Maghhout said it was Mohammad al-Maghout.If I were asked the same question, my answer would be, in addition to both my mother and father, the late poet Nizar Qabbani and former President Quwatli. As for ‘inspirational figures’ in my life, I would name Munir al-Ajlani, a scholar and politician from the 1930s who introduced me to the world of Syrian history, Professor Samir Seikaley of AUB, who made me love history at large, and my friend Abdulsalam Haykal, who encouraged and helped me write my first book when we were students at t the Faculty of Political Science at AUB; a seemingly crazy task for two 19-year olds.

I once administered a survey to my students, three different classes in two consecutive semesters. These were well-to-Syrians, students at the Faculty of International Relations, born in the mid to late 1980s. I then expanded the same survey to include Syrians, of a different age group and different social strata. One question was, “Who is your inspirational figure in life?” This was shortly after last summer’s war in Lebanon and I expected them to say, “Hasan Nasrallah.” It was a surprise to me when over 60% came out with “None! We don’t have any inspirational figures in our life.” Their parents’ generation would have probably replied, “Gamal Abdul-Nasser.” These young people, however, did not have motivating figures to look up to—nobody to view as a role model. That was a sad reality.

I then asked them to name their favorite former non-Syrian, Arab leader. Sheikh Zayed of the UAE came in first, with 24%. The favorite non-Arab leader was Mahatir Mohammad, who is to Malaysia what Zayed is to the UAE. He got 36%. Lagging way behind were revolutionary leaders like Gamal Abdul-Nasser and Yasser Arafat. These young Syrians were more impressed by a leader who could attract investment, create jobs, and build a success story for his country from scratch, like Malaysia and the UAE, than one who preached revolutionary socialism and promised to defeat the State of Israel. When asked to name their ‘worst’ former non-Syrian Arab leader, Saddam Hussein came in first, with 35%, seconded by Gamal Abdul-Nasser, with 21%. Anwar al-Sadat came in third, with 18%, beating even Bashir Gemayel who got 8%.

Respondents were then asked to name their ‘best political memory.’ 40% said it was the liberation of South Lebanon in 2000. 30% said it was the downfall of Saddam Hussein in 2003. As for ‘worst political memory,’ a high 22% said it was the assassination of Lebanon’s former Prime Minister Rafiq al-Harriri. They dreaded it because it led to a series of negative events that were bad for Syria. One would have imagined the worst political memory to be the Arab-Israeli War of 1967, which led to the occupation of the Golan Heights, the Sinai Peninsula, the West Bank, and Jerusalem. That war, however, received 90 votes (18%) and was seconded by the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, which received 70 votes (14%). In a landslide victory, George W. Bush came in as worst foreign leader, with 84%. Coming in second—again with little surprise—was then-British Prime Minister Tony Blair, with 10%. Third was Jacques Chirac of France, with 6% and fourth was German Chancellor Angela Merkel, with 2%.

Respondents were then asked to think hard and come up with a list of people they thought would qualify as inspirational figures, people who they respected and looked up to. The Prophet Mohammad ranked #1. Other names ranged from Hafez al-Assad, Hasan Nasrallah, Antune Saadah, Che Guevara, and Fidel Castro, to Amr Khaled, Saladin, and Omar Ibn al-Khattab. Somewhere in between came people like Winston Churchill, Charles de Gaulle, Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Ghandi, and Karl Marx. The list did not contain a single artist, writer, poet, or woman figure. It also, not surprisingly, did not have a single American icon, not even an entertainment or sports celebrity (although David Beckham was on the list!). Strangely enough, however, and in testimony to how un-secular society was becoming, not a single person wrote, “Kamal Ataturk.”

These results, measured by what I am getting from different interviews with famous Syrians, were surprising and alarming. They bring to mind an old story when Galileo was asked by one of his students: “Unhappy are those who don’t have heroes!”

Galileo replied, “No, unhappy are those who still need heroes!”

Posted in Politics, Syria | Leave a Comment »

Sarkozy: “I Love America.” Some interesting facts about the new French President on his first “official” visit to the land he loves

Posted by vmsalama on November 7, 2007

I appeared this evening one of the news programs to discuss Sarkozy’s “official” visit with the United States today.  Over the course of the day, I gathered snippets from various news sources just to help me organize my thoughts.  I have to admit, I like the guy.  I especially liked it when he stormed off the set of his 60 minutes interview last month when the reporter asked him about his failing marriage!! (see YouTube clip below)  Anyhow, I thought I’d list the bullet points for all of you — it’s very informative and some of it is certainly very telling on its own. 

SARKOZY FACTS

  • Nicolas Sarkozy ran on a platform of “major change” and so far, he has delivered.
  • First official visit since his election.  Difference over Iraq should be no barrier toward friendship.
  • First address to Congress by a French leader in more than a decade.
  • Washington Post calls it Sarkozy’s “Washington charm offensive”
  • French notoriously adverse to change
  • Jacque Chirac’s modest plans to reform welfare was rejected by hundreds of thousands
  • Prior to 2007, in every parliamentary election since 1 978 the French had voted out of office whichever party they had voted in the previous time.
  • Sarkozy got elected running on an explicit platform of major change and praise for hard work, discipline, tax cuts—and even the United States.
  • DOMESTIC POLICIES: compromise on issues like the 35-hour work week, university reform and “minimum service” for public transport.   The biggest domestic test for Sarkozy will come if he tries to liberalize France’s generous welfare state and notoriously inflexible labor market laws.
  • Deep down, the new French president is a nationalist who puts French interests first.
  • LIBYA: His unilateral intervention in the case of five Bulgarian nurses held hostage in Libya, who were freed just prior to the announcement of French arms and nuclear energy deals with Tripoli. 
  • He took a great risk during the campaign by paying a personal visit to President George W. Bush and praising the unpopular United States—steps then assumed to constitute political suicide—but he won nonetheless, suggesting that French anti-Americanism is both overstated and more limited to Parisian elite circles than commonly believed.
  • MIDDLE EAST:  France under Sarkozy is also likely to see eye-to-eye more often with the United States on the critical question of the Middle East. Sarkozy is a strong supporter of Israel (while also a determined promoter of an independent Palestinian state)  and an opponent of Syrian intervention in Lebanon.
  • IRAN: Like the United States, he argues that an Iranian nuclear weapon is “unacceptable” and supports stronger economic sanctions against the Tehran regime, which he denounces for its support for terrorism, repression of human rights and opposition to Israel. Sarkozy has publicly warned that a failure by the international community to deal with the Iranian nuclear issue through diplomacy and sanctions could lead to military conflict, though he  makes clear that everything possible must be done to avoid such a “catastrophic” outcome.  Unlike his predecessor, he is open to the principle of imposing economic sanctions outside the context of the UN Security Council, if Russia and China are unwilling to go along. Also unlike Chirac, he has appealed to major French energy companies like Total and Gaz de France to stop investing in Iran.   Sarkozy Emphasized the need for diplomacy to go hand-in-hand with the sanctions.

Sarkozy said it is “unacceptable” that Iran should have a nuclear weapon, and he expressed his belief in “the effectiveness of sanctions.  After Tony Blair, a close Bush ally, stepped down as British prime minister this year, Sarkozy, 52, became the most vocal European leader to share the U.S. opposition to Iran’s nuclear program

(Last month the White House issued a new string of sanctions against Iran targeting the nation’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, the elite Quds Force, several top military officials and three major Iranian banks.)

  • IRAQ: On Iraq, the source of the greatest French-American dispute since the 1 956 Suez crisis, Sarkozy has endorsed his predecessor’s opposition to the war (while also arguing that Chirac’s diplomacy was over the top). But he believes now is the time for France and America to put that dispute behind them.  Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner—one of the few French politicians to have supported regime change in Iraq—traveled to Baghdad in August 2007 and announced that France was ready to play a role in international efforts to stabilize Iraq. 

INTERESTING POINT – Iraq, the conflict that split the allies four years ago, was rarely spoken of publicly during the visit. The French president made no direct mention of the war in his speech to Congress yesterday. At Mount Vernon, Sarkozy said only there should be a “united” and democratic Iraq, while stopping short of offering solutions. Bush thanked Sarkozy for sending Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner to Baghdad in a gesture of support.

Now, on Iraq, Bernard Kouchner’s trip to Iraq was very successful. What does France want? A united Iraq. No one — it is in no one’s interest to see Iraq dismantled. We want a democratic Iraq. We want a diverse Iraq where each component — component element of Iraqi society has learned to live with others, an Iraq which can administer and govern itself and that has the means of ensuring the peace and security of every one of its citizens

  • AFGHANISTAN: pro-American positions on the war in Afghanistan and the Iranian nuclear dispute. While Bush describes Iraq as the central front in the war on terror, Sarkozy suggested yesterday that Afghanistan is the vital fight, and said France might commit more troops there. France has about 1,000 soldiers in the Afghan capital, Kabul, and moved Mirage warplanes from Tajikistan into Afghanistan in September to assist the war effort. Chirac withdrew about 200 special-forces troops earlier this year, raising doubts about France’s commitment in Afghanistan.

“France will remain engaged in Afghanistan as long as it takes, because what’s at stake in that country is the future of our values and that of the Atlantic alliance,” Sarkozy said in the first speech to the House and Senate by a French leader in almost 12 years.

At a time when majorities in all European countries—including France—are highly critical of U.S. foreign policy, it would be unreasonable to assume that longstanding difficulties in the French-American relationship are behind us.

Sarkozy has already been compared to everyone from Napoleon to Margaret Thatcher, but a more apt, contemporary comparison might be Britain’s Tony Blair. Like Sarkozy, the youthful Blair also challenged party and political “sacred cows” in his first months, and he was similarly accused of accumulating too much personal power, ignoring the parliament, manipulating the media, cozying up to dubious tycoons and aligning his country’s foreign policy too closely with that of the United States.  (but Blair won three consecutive elections)

·        On PAKISTAN, SARKOZY SAID:   “On Pakistan, yes, we’re worried about the situation. It’s worrisome, and we need to have elections as swiftly as possible.You cannot combat extremism using the same methods as extremists. And it is very important, it is of the essence, that Pakistan organize elections. And, like President Bush, I wish this to take place as speedily as possible. Let me remind you that this is a country of 150 million inhabitants who happen to have nuclear weapons. This is very important for us, that one day we should wake up with a government, an administration in Pakistan which is in the hands of the extremists. And we should, each and everyone of us, think about this. The principles, the values that we uphold and that we defend, and we must continue to uphold. And then there’s the complexity, as it were, in the field. That’s why it’s important to convene elections — call elections.”

Sarkozy’s Address to Joint Congressional Session

Posted in France, Politics, Sarkozy | Leave a Comment »