Wanderlust…

ONLY IN ADVENTURE DO WE TRULY FIND OURSELVES.

Archive for August, 2007

An Interview with Egyptian Author and Feminist Nawal Al-Saadawi

Posted by vmsalama on August 21, 2007

By Vivian Salama
Forward Magazine

 

 

It may have come at the expense of 12-year old Badour Shaker’s life on an Upper Egypt operating table, but the Egyptian government recently announced a complete ban on female circumcision, known as genital mutilation (FGM).  The new ban is an amendment to a former provision that permits only qualified physicians to perform the surgery.  The outdated practiced, performed on girls before puberty, is believed by some more conservative families to protect a girls’ chastity and lessen her sexual desires. 
            In a recent article by renowned Egyptian physician, writer and FGM victim Nawal Al-Saadawi said the move comes far too late.  “Badour, did you have to die for some light to shine in the dark minds?” she wrote in Egyptian daily Al-Masry Al-Yom following announcement of the ban.  “Did you have to pay with your dear life a price … for doctors and clerics to learn that the right religion doesn’t cut children’s organs.”
            In an interview with FORWARD Magazine from Ohio University where she is teaching a course this summer called “Dissidence and Creativity,” Al-Saadawi related the act of genital mutilation to what she considers a “similar oppression.”  “I connect female circumcision to the policies of George Bush,” she said.  “There is a very clear relation between sexual oppression and political oppression.”
            Nawal Al-Saadawi was born in the Egyptian village of Kafr Tahla.  In 1951, she left to study psychiatry at Cairo University.  She went on to eventually become Egypt’s Director of Public Health at a time when women’s leadership roles were few and far between.  She began a magazine called “Health” which addressed subjects relating to preventative medicine.  She also began to write about women’s issues, particularly the oppression they experienced in the Arab world.  This would lead to her dismissal as the Director as well as the shutdown of her magazine.  The experience unleashed a passion within her that Egyptians would learn cannot be silenced.
            In 1981, she was imprisoned under the Sadat regime, for alleged “crimes against the state.”  Even the bars of the prisons could not deter her from her activism. Al-Saadawi formed the Arab Women’s Solidarity Association (AWSA) – the first legal, independent feminist organization in Egypt – and continued to write in prison, at times scribbling her words on toilet paper as it was the only thing available to her. Upon her release in 1983, those scraps of notes were published in Memoirs from the Women’s Prison.
Al-Saadawi’s battle against political and social oppression continued. AWSA had grown to have some 500 members locally and more than 2,000 internationally until it was banned in 1991 following Al-Saadawi’s criticism of US involvement in the Gulf War, saying the issue should have been solved among the Arabs.  “I always say that Bin Laden and George Bush are twins,” says Al-Saadawi.  “Colonialism is a big reason for our problems.  Who created the jihad in Afghanistan?  It is the United States.”
            Al-Saadawi speaks from the heart when addressing politics.  In 2004, the then 74-year old activist announced that she would enter Egypt’s historic multi-candidate election, joining other top contenders like Al-Gad party leader Ayman Nour – who is currently serving five years behind bars for alleged campaign fraud – and Al-Wafd leader Noaman Gomaa.  At the time of her bid for presidency, Al-Saadawi told AFP, “I am going to stand in the presidential election, not to win but to get the Egyptian people moving in favor of a reform of the constitution and to oppose corruption and American colonialism.”
            Several months later, Al-Saadawi announced she would boycott the race, along with another prominent candidate, Saad Eddin Ibrahim – both candidates citing the steep requirements for all contenders.  The September 2005 election would reveal unsurprising results: Egypt’s president of then-24 years, Hosni Mubarak was announced the winner by a whopping 88.6 percent of the votes – a victory many attributed to intimidation by national security forces and campaign restrictions by his challengers (including a ban against anyone from the popular – but outlawed – Muslim Brotherhood from taking part in the election).  “The whole election was a play, an illusion,” insists Al-Saadawi.  “The left and right were against me – they were working with the government.  Politics has become dirty.” 
            The biggest problem in Egypt and throughout the Middle East, according to Al-Saadawi, is political organization – or the lack thereof.  As part of her course at Ohio University this summer, she focused on the inability of “leftist” and right-wing parties throughout the region to find a common ground in their journey to a greater Middle East.  “In Egypt, for example, after the 1952 Revolution led by [Gamal Abdel] Nasser, there was promise and hope.  Sadat came and ruined the country economically and created a power strife and Mubarak followed the same rule.  Egypt lost its power to Africa and the Arab world.  It has no power now.” 
            She continues: “The political situation in the Arab region is a disaster.  Look what happened in Iraq; the Palestinian people are being killed; in Egypt, 40 percent are under the poverty line; in Syria, the government is allying itself with the neo-colonial powers.  The elite people in the Arab countries are cowards and they give bad example to the others.  We need new political organizations that represent the people – the working class, the students, even the children.”
In 1992, Al Saadawi’s name appeared on a Muslim fundamentalist death list, prompting her to flee Egypt for five years. Her books have largely detailed explosive narratives that often address women’s sexuality and other taboo issues in the Muslim world.  She criticizes the Islamic establishments of Egypt, saying that genuine Islamic tradition is not their goal, and rather, they are motivated by the same “dirty” politics that drives ruling parties across the Arab world.  “Even Hassan Al-Banna used Islam to create the Muslim Brotherhood for political reasons,” she says.  “We need someone who really struggled.”    
The provocative nature of her work continues to enrage Islamic conservatives to this day.  Al-Saadawi’s struggle for justice continues to this day.  Her latest play, “Resigns in the Summit Meeting,” caused an uproar among religious officials in Egypt who accuse her of denouncing Islam.  In February of this year, she chose to take on opportunities outside of Egypt because circumstances had left her feeling unsafe at home.  Her dilemma would not end there.  “On my way from Rotterdam to Brussels, my novel was stolen with my money and my passports and everything – I was robbed!” she recalls, sounding far less distraught than most might be under such circumstances.  She is now in the process of rewriting the novel from scratch. 
            Yet the more you speak with this seasoned writer, the more her lack of regret surprises you.  After all, how can one who has been through so much carry on the way she does with a chip on her shoulder.  It is in her book of personal reflection entitled Memoirs from the Women’s Prison where she wrote “Nothing is more perilous than truth in a world that lies…there is no power in the world that can strip my writings from me.” 
And so she continues to write, despite the threats to her life; despite the physical assaults she endured as a child; despite having grown older – a reality even this boisterous woman has learned to embrace.  “Even despite all of this, I am an optimist,” she says.  “In the end, the reality is that hope is power.”

  

                       

    

Posted in Egypt, Female Circumcision, Human Rights, Nawal Al-Saadawi, Politics, Sexuality | Leave a Comment »

Today’s Mistakes Matter More Than Partition

Posted by vmsalama on August 20, 2007

Newsweek/Washington Post — PostGlobal Forum

by Vivian Salama

There is no right or wrong answer to whether the 1947 partition of India and Pakistan was a mistake. Were mistakes made? Sure. Are mistakes still being made? Absolutely.

map-india-pakistan.jpg

 

The fact remains that for Pakistanis, it is far too dangerous to acknowledge such a question publicly because to question partition is to question the legitimacy of Pakistan (the same goes for Bangladesh). Certainly the younger generations may not have a proper sense of the losses and gains that were suffered by both sides and so any doubts may evaporate with time. It is natural that they feel closer nationalistic ties to modern day Pakistan and not to a greater subcontinent that was bitterly divided over half a century ago. The older generation that witnessed the bloodshed and migration, meanwhile, has good reason to second guess partition given the current political instability.

Like with so many conflicts in history, the partition of India and Pakistan was seen as a way to avoid civil war. Muslims in the now partitioned Punjab, for example, were the most impoverished residents which naturally created a sense of resentment. Many then recognized the opportunity to draw upon the more salient religious identifications as a means of building linkages and drawing distinctions. We mustn’t forget that in much of India prior to 1947, Muslims and Hindus for the most part lived harmoniously (as they do today in most of India) and partition by some was seen more as a precaution to avoid religious marginalization following the colonial exodus.

As for India, one of the headlines in the Times of India last week said it all: “60 and getting sexier.” Three factors contribute to India’s stability: political democracy, military security, and economic development. In fact, there is much that contributes to this ’sex’ appeal India proudly flaunted as it rang in 60 years of independence from British rule. For one thing, it is by and large one of the most successful secular democracies in the world. The country’s economy is growing at 9% (although poverty and malnutrition remain rampant). Meanwhile, India’s ambitious nuclear program (which has received thumbs up from the United States) is an understandable intimidation to Pakistan and so it is no surprise that its neighbor would look to secure its own borders via nuclear proliferation.

In many ways, partition may be viewed as a failure for Pakistan. The Islamic Republic has stumbled both politically and economically over the last 60 years. It lacks a functional democracy and remains one of the poorest countries in the world. It undertook a path that stunted democratic political development. The influential elite had to be incorporated into the political process, which they then manipulated to their benefit. As a result, Pakistan remains a dictatorship and its domestic situation is growing increasingly volatile.

Something worth considering is a comment made by Pakistan’s exiled former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto last week at the Council of Foreign Relations in New York. She noted that Pakistan’s founder Mohammed Ali Jinnah died “a year after Pakistan was founded,” and so Pakistan lacked “a national leader with the authority, the respect to help [it] develop democratic political institutions,” whereas India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, who ruled for 17 years “provided the leadership that could help a new nation strengthen its democratic institutions,” Bhutto said.

It is far too difficult to look back on the 1947 partition of India and Pakistan as a mistake; just as it is equally difficult to look ahead and envision a partitioned Iraq, for example. There is too much damage control that needs to be done today and looking back will only further delay things. Pakistan must work to establish political and economic stability on the ground, and India should make a genuine effort to assist its neighbor in this time of turmoil. Otherwise, divided or united, the subcontinent will face even greater challenges to come.

Posted in India, Islam, Newsweek, Pakistan, Partition, Politics, Washington Post | Leave a Comment »

Hoder gets booted from his weblog domain

Posted by vmsalama on August 14, 2007

by Vivian Salama

On the temporary homepage for his highly read blog, journalist and blogger Hossein Derakhshan has posted a plea. 

“Last Friday, I was kicked out of my hosting company,” the entry dated August 13th begins.His site, one of the most highly read Persian weblogs, was  booted from his home domain (hoder.com), forcing Derakhshan to move years of entries onto a temporary server.              

                                                                         hossein_derakhshan_news_from_iran_blog.jpg

            The incident began when lawyers of Washington Institute for the Near East Policy fellow Mehdi Khalaji claimed Derakhshan had mistranslated an article written by Khalaji about the Iranian election campaign. According to Derakhshan, Khalaji’s lawyers sent a notice to Hoder’s hosting company plus his domain registrar “Go Daddy” asking them to remove all defamatory material about Khalaji, publish and apology and pay $10,000 in damages.

            According to a legal document provided by Derakhshan from the Toronto-based law firm of Cassels Brock, he is accused of numerous charges, including: “falsely stating that [Khalaji] is a traitor to the government and people of Iran”; stating that Khalaji “is a dupe or a puppet of the U.S. government,” saying Khalaji “counseled the Vice President of the United States of America to bomb thousands of men, women and children,” and that Khalaji “counsels enemies of Iran and of humanity.”  Derakhshan denies the charges and calls actions by his hosting company a blow to free speech.

On his temporary site, he writes: “It’s all quite ironic that the way I am treated in the United States (being kicked out of my servers) is worse than that in the Islamic Republic of Iran (filtering my blog and forcing me to sign an apology when I was last in Tehran).  Ever more ironic is that a blog I was editing to cover internet censorship in Iran has also been shut down.”

            Hossein is no stranger to such obstacles.  While leaving Tehran in Spring 2006, authorities detained the now 32-year old activist to question him about numerous posts on his popular site.  Authorities forced him to sign an apology for his blogging activities before permitting him to leave the country, according to his blog. He continues to blog defiantly at risk of never being allowed back into his homeland.

 

Hossein has provided the following documents in support of his claims:

1) The initial legal notice from Khalaji’s lawyer:
http://hoder.com/weblog/images/khalajithreat.pdf

2) Email exchange with the hosting company led to termination of his accounts:
http://hodertemp.blogspot.com/2007/08/accounts-and-billing-hosting-matters.html

3) His trouble with Islamic Republic of Iran’s authorities:
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2006/03/70522

Posted in Bloggers, Freedom of Speech, Iran | 1 Comment »

Bible Dolls Hit the Shelves at Wal-Mart

Posted by vmsalama on August 10, 2007

By Vivian Salama 

Jesus, Mary and Joseph!
They don’t fire lasers or wear trendy outfits, but the newest actions figures set to hit the shelves of Wal-Marts across the nation are sure to put a little spirit – maybe even some Holy Spirit – into playtime.  They’re called Messengers of Faith – biblical icons turned play box pals by California-based One2Believe, a company that prides itself on selling real life superheroes.
The toys range in size and sophistication.  Jesus, the biggest seller of the bunch, recites various Parables and Psalms with the simple press of a button.  Moses reminds children “you shall not commit adultery” and “you shall not steal,” as well as the other Ten Commandments.  Then there is the newest addition – Samson, the strongest man to ever live, according to the Bible, which One2Believe CEO David Socha believes will give Jesus a run for his money.  “It’s a cool looking toy,” he says enthusiastically.  “What little boy wouldn’t want the strongest man to ever live in his toy box?” 
Many of the dolls even recite stories and they come equipped with a start-stop button so children can return to the beginning whenever they want.  There is a full Nativity set – which includes a baby Jesus, a few angels, three wise men and some barn animals to complete the tale.  All the dolls are modestly dressed in the type of robes believed to have been worn at the time of Christ.  They even come with miniature books so children can read along with their story-telling toy. 
Why, in an era when sex and violence sells, have toys in the likeness of Biblical legends gained the confidence – and multimillion dollar investment – of America’s largest discount retail store?  Industry analysts say it won’t take a miracle for these playtime newcomers to hit it big.  “Whether the Messenger of Faith or other such toys sell well in Wal-Mart will likely depend on price, quality of the product and appeal to the target customer, i.e. ‘does my kid want it?’,” says Christine Johnson, managing editor of Christian Retailing magazine. 

In fact, Christian retail is big business having earned an estimated $4.63 billion in 2006 according the Association of Christian Retail (CBA).  That’s up from $4 billion in 2000.   While Harry Potter may be all the rage right now, the Holy Bible remains the best selling book of all time.  In fact, the majority of Christian retail profits come from book sales – an estimated 5,000 to 6,000 titles will be published this year alone.  “Christian books are sold everywhere these days: at warehouse clubs, big-box stores such as Wal-Mart and Target, and Hallmark, which acquired DaySpring, a Christian greeting card company, in 1999,” Johnson adds.
The business has also expanded to include music, gifts, jewelry and apparel.  Television programming is also popular.  Dozens of networks cater specifically to Christian audiences, including the Gospel Channel, available in some 20 million American homes.   
Remember Mel Gibson’s controversial 2004 release of Passion of the Christ?  The film grossed a whopping $610 million worldwide which Socha admits sparked an awakening for Christian retailers. “Passion broke a lot of barriers,” he says.  “We’re trying to bring that same quality to the toy industry.”
Still, the battle for the toy box is fierce with veterans like Superman and Barbie knocking out the competition and virtual action figures luring kids in front of the computer screen.  Ultimately, those working in Christian retail look to offer an alternative to what Socha calls “evil toys.”  He admits his company even thought to introduce characters which represent “manifestations of Satan,” but a number of consultants (mostly Christian clergy and activists) urged against it.  “We don’t want to touch on the violence, the promiscuity – the messy parts of life.”
 
Socha credits its two year success not just on the quality of his product, but on its disciples working to spread the good word.  A network of 10,000 stay-at-home moms have been recruited as publicists and sales reps around the country selling the toys to neighbors and friends and churches alike.  The moms are sometimes paid a modest fee; other times they are awarded in the way of soccer trips, ballet fees and other children’s activities. 
The Messenger of Faith figurines – which ironically are all made in Communist China – are all boxed up in a Valencia warehouse and set for their August 1 Wal-Mart debut. Many of the shipments – 425 in all –  will go to Wal-Marts in the South and Midwest – the so-called Bible Belt.  Still, Socha is quick to dismiss this as a retail jackpot.  “This is a tremendous blessing but it’s also a challenge because the product has to sell on Wal-Mart’s shelves.”
For now, Socha and the folks at Wal-Mart can only pray that the Greatest Story Ever Told yields a happy ending for them as well. 
  

Posted in Christian, Toys, WalMart | Leave a Comment »

North Korean Resort Gives Foreign Tourists Window on Hermit Kingdom

Posted by vmsalama on August 9, 2007

Click here for link to World Politics Review link
Vivian Salama | 08 Aug 2007

To see photos from my trip to North Korea/DMZ, click here

KUMGANG MOUNTAIN, North Korea — Bags packed, hiking boots tightly laced, visors on, cameras in hand, a few dozen South Korean tourists make their way to an unlikely vacation destination. Their journey, a mere four hours from Seoul, will take them through barbed wire checkpoints, and at their destination they will be greeted by machine-gun-toting soldiers.In cooperation with the government of South Korea and the Hyundai Asan Corp., North Korea is dabbling in the art of making money through tourism, offering a peephole into the Hermit Kingdom for visitors from all over the world.
 
Kumgang Mountain first opened in 1998 after Hyundai Asan paid some $1 billion to the North Korean government for exclusive rights to run a vacation destination. The company spent an additional $400 million building the resort. The 922-square mile complex, located just over the demilitarized zone on the Korean Peninsula’s eastern seaboard, sees around 100,000 tourists per year, most of them South Koreans. North and South Korea technically remain at war, as a peace agreement was never signed following the 1953 ceasefire that ended the Korean conflict. After more than 50 years of solitude, however, North Korea’s economy is in shambles and the South Korean government, under its “Sunshine Policy,” is more open than ever to economic cooperation with its northern neighbor. Kumgang employs 779 North Koreans and 250 South Koreans, according to Hyundai Asan’s Ha-Jung Byun. An additional 450 employees are Korean residents of China whose families fled the Peninsula during the Korean War and now have the opportunity to return to Kumgang on one-year work contracts.Similarly, the nearby Kaesong Industrial Region, which now hosts 23 South Korean companies and is expected eventually to host dozens more, has employed more than 100,000 Koreans from both sides of the border since it opened in June 2003. Again, North Koreans make up the bulk of Kaesong employees, each of whom earns less than $70 a month.Kumgang and Kaesong are built on the old invasion route used by North Korean armies to attack South Korea during the war. “North Korea hesitated opening both places because it is a strategic military path for them,” says Yong In Yi, a reporter with the Seoul-based Hankyoreh news service. Kim Jong-il worked hard to convince powerful members of the North Korean military that the projects should be built, he says.Signs of the dismal state of the nation’s economy are evident even despite the restricted access granted to tourists. Emaciated cows can be seen making their way across barren fields, and villages — which tourists have no opportunity to see up close — are visibly derelict even from afar.When signs of renewal and prosperity are seen, it is difficult to tell whether they have been staged for the benefit of foreign tourists. The Holy Valley Temple, a brightly painted wooden complex that suffered extensive damage in a bombing by U.S. planes during the Korean War, has been rebuilt. In a country where organized religion is prohibited and leaders of the Kim dynasty are deified, one elderly monk visiting from South Korea speculates that the reconstruction is a facade meant to give tourists the impression that religion is openly practiced in the North.The effects of decades of North Korean propaganda are also evident in conversations with locals. Most of the North Koreans encountered by the tourist group say an attack by the United States is imminent and believe nuclear weapons are their country’s best defense.The ride to Kumgang, 20 minutes from the border, is an eye-opening experience. Holes have been cut into the mountains to serve as concrete garages for tanks. One building is decorated with a huge portrait of Kim Il-Sung. Soldiers are everywhere. As the tourist bus passes, the troops follow the vehicle until it is out of sight. Members of the group are told not to photograph them. The consequences of doing so would be “very bad,” according to the guide.Kumgang Mountain resort is surrounded by a green fence marking the border between the real North Korea outside and the Potemkin village inside. The North Korean employees wear pins depicting the late “Eternal Leader” Kim Il-Sung, and they speak carefully, wary of probing questions. The only currency accepted is the U.S. dollar and no opportunity to separate tourists from their cash is missed — even the portable toilets cost $2 to use.

Among the group are a handful of South Korean and foreign journalists who have been invited along by the South Korean Press Foundation. During a hiking outing, the reporters shower locals with questions about everything from their family lives to their impressions of America. Most of the North Koreans seem to assume their questioners are curious only because they are journalists, not because North Korea remains an enigma to the outside world.

Not everyone warms to the group. During lunch, a waitress is outraged that she is photographed without permission, but grows friendly when the photographers agree to delete the photos. Her father is a doctor in Pyongyang and waiting tables is a top-notch job in North Korea, she says, requiring a college degree.

Later, a group of North Koreans is eager to discuss politics. Pyongyang native Lee Il-Joon says he is happy that the Democrats are now the majority in the U.S. Congress and he wants to know if Condoleezza Rice is planning a visit to Pyongyang given the recent progress in the Six Party nuclear talks. He expresses dismay about the situation in Iraq and is ambivalent about the 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States. “We were sad to hear about people dying on September 11, but I think the U.S. deserved this attack because of all of its wrongdoings in the world,” he says.

Similar sentiments are expressed by other North Koreans, many of whom say the United States has not yet attacked North Korea only because it fears Kim Jong-il. “The chairman protects us from all the evil in the world,” Joon says.

Posted in North Korea, Politics, South Korea, World Politics Review | Leave a Comment »